What’s So Funny About Blood Lust?
by jayewells on Aug.16, 2010, under Uncategorized
Despite the popularity of urban fantasy as a genre, people are always asking me what it is. Usually, after explaining the whole paranormal fantasy, modern world stuff I go on to tell them that urban fantasy is also a melting pot of genre — a multi-genre, if you will.
It’s true: There’s something for everyone in urban fantasy. That’s why I started reading the genre and also why I write it. Playing with genre conventions and combining elements in new ways is part of what makes writing UF so fun.
You know what else makes it fun? The humor.
Hi! I’m Jaye Wells. I like a little sarcasm with my blood. I like making fun of the things that scare me. And there’s nothing I love better than a some seriously twisted humor.
But while I aspire to the love child of threesome between Janet Evanovich, Chuck Palahniuk and Christopher Moore, I get that not everyone laughs at the same things I do. Remember how I said Urban Fantasy has something for everyone? Well, whether you like your humor subtle, sarcastic or slapstick, there’s an urban fantasy author out there writing it. So I thought I’d kick off our two weeks together by talking about one of my favorite kinds of humor in urban fantasy: Snark.
First, can we agree the term is overused? These days, pretty much anything anyone says that’s the least bit sarcastic is labeled snark. But, in my opinion, true snark is an art form. In fact, I prefer the term “sardonica” but so far no one else is biting on that term. So snark it is. Now, what the heck is it?
At its best, snark is witty cynicism with a heavy dose of sarcasm. At its worst, snark comes off as snotty and, well, let’s face it, douche-y. Especially when wielded by blog trolls, obnoxious radio personalities and pseudo-intellectuals.
It’s also often confused for other common comedic devices: repartee, satire, gallows humor, farce, irony, parody. The confusion often comes from the fact that snark blends so well with these other devices and is even combined with them to great effect by skilled comedic writers. But in my opinion, snark is really just a preemptive offensive defense.
Bear with me while I get a little deep for a moment. Often the most effective wielders of snark are highly intelligent people who spent at least part of their childhoods being punched by metaphorical or literal bullies. In other words, they developed verbal weapons where they did not have physical ones. In addition, these same people probably spent a large part of their teen years observing their peers to try and figure out why everyone else seemed to fit in while they did not. Thus, a snarkist was born: a keen observer of human nature that wields words like weapons to cut down opponents before they themselves can be cut down.
I should also point out that these same breeding grounds can also give birth to writers and serial killers, but that’s another blog post altogether.
In fiction, snark is often used by characters who have built thick walls around themselves. That’s probably why so many urban fantasy heroines (and Sabina Kane is no exception) wield both snark and literal weapons. The guns kill enemies and the words keep potential allies at bay, but both types of weapons are meant to disguise vulnerabilities.
But given snark’s somewhat regrettable reasons for existing, why do we find it so freaking funny? Again, this is only my opinion, but I think we all have an inner snarkist. It’s just that snarky characters in books actually say what they’re thinking. They flaunt the polite rules of society that demand that if we don’t have anything nice to say, we don’t say it at all. And how many of us haven’t wanted to speak our minds more often? To be able to say just the right cut down at the exact right moment (instead of thinking of it two hours later when you’re halfway into a gallon of Chunky Monkey).
As an author, writing snark can be incredibly cathartic. First of all, I get to say things in print I might never say in public. If you read my twitter feed it might surprise you to know I actually do censor myself. But Giguhl, the hairless cat demon from my Sabina Kane series, says all sorts of things I’d be embarrassed to say in polite company. Second, it’s really fun to see how a character’s use of snark changes as they grow through a series. As a character becomes more open to relationships with other characters, their humor tends to get less caustic and defensive and more driven by camaraderie and good-natured ribbing.
I could probably talk about snark all week, but I’m more interested in knowing your opinions on this subject. Do you agree with my definition of snark? What urban fantasy authors do you think use it well? But most of all, inquiring minds want to know: Do you like your urban fantasy dark, light or somewhere in between?
Related posts:
- Exceptions Are The Rule Nicole asked whether you enjoy nomadic or home-base protagonists in your UF. That got me thinking about common settings. Or more specifically, whether Urban Fantasy must always be urban. The short answer is no. We can all think of examples of UF novels not set in large cities. The truth is the...
- We’ll Always Have Babel Clash I can’t believe our time at Babel Clash is already at an end. We’ve had two weeks filled with many things: laughter, tears, obscenity, fangs and snark. But most of all–love. I’ll always remember it fondly. I know you will too. Huge thanks to Dane for being such an excellent host...
- Love is a Battlefield Hello Babel Clash! Did you miss us? We missed you. To kick off our triumphant return to this hallowed blog, Nicole and I decided we’d spend the first couple of days talking about romance in UF. For those of you who hate love, don’t worry, we’re moving on past the...
- Comedy and Other Tragedies I love writing urban fantasy. There aren’t many rules. Because it’s a multigenre, there are no prescribed formulas. Conventions, sure. But UF is as likely to flaunt conventions as follow them. Also, because the monsters we write about are powerful metaphors, there are many opportunities for twisting expectations and skewing...
- Tough Love for Tough Chicks, Or How to Embarrass a Magepire Assassin As Nicole pointed out yesterday, we write vastly different types of heroines. Sabina Kane is closer to what most people think of as the stereotypical kick-ass UF heroine. She’s an assassin. She’s half-vampire, half-mage. She had a childhood that puts the funk in dysfunction. She likes guns and blood. But...
6 Comments for this entry
1 Trackback or Pingback for this entry
-
Tweets that mention What’s So Funny About Blood Lust? | Babel Clash -- Topsy.com
August 16th, 2010 on 10:45 pm[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by jayewells and Renae Jones, Terry . Terry said: What’s So Funny About Blood Lust?: Despite the popularity of urban fantasy as a genre, people are always asking me… http://bit.ly/c3JWuj [...]

August 16th, 2010 on 11:57 pm
I love snark. I seriously have problems reading books that don’t have it. I try, I really do, but even dark urban fantasy like Vicki Pettersson’s books have snark, and it works. Beside you– I think Ilona Andrews, Jeaniene Frost, Jocelynn Drake, Stacia Kane to name a few all have the snark factor down SO well.
I love urban fantasy- I love it dark and light– but the dark almost needs snark more because it is so dark, if that makes sense. Nothing like having your heart wrenched, and then having a good laugh next.
August 17th, 2010 on 10:52 am
I often tell people that if you think I’m a smart-aleck, blame my family, quick wits were valued. When I had trouble with other kids, my family helped me find verbal jibes to baffle the tormentors.
I enjoy the smart retort, both pre-emptive and responsive. While I enjoy the occasional carthartically dark angst, usually I want something lighter with my dark urban fantasy. The humor lightens the mood and provides necessary contrast.
August 17th, 2010 on 11:10 am
Brenda, I always enjoy that contrast between gut-wrenching and hilarious. I think it’s because real life can also be that way. Some of the best laughs I’ve ever had are at funerals.
Sewicked, I just find all-angst all the time boring. I guess it feels more like melodrama. Plus, I’ve never bought why all-powerful beings would be so depressed all the time.
August 17th, 2010 on 4:52 pm
I definitely love some snark in my UF. And I gravitate toward the darker UF. I try to read the lighter stuff, but it just doesn’t hold my attention as well. Light stuff is a fun diversion every now and then, but I absolutely devour the snark and the dark. Give me Seanan McGuire, Ilona Andrews, or A. Lee Martinez and I’ll be happy as a clam all dang day.
I feel that way about just about everything I read/watch/listen to, I guess. I read a ton of comic books, but only the dark and funny ones really. I love music, but my favorite bands are clever and just a touch depressing in addition to being catchy and singable (like The National, for example).
August 19th, 2010 on 1:02 pm
I might be the odd duck out, but I like snark in everything. If an author can make me laugh while giving me a literary suckerpunch at the same time…all the better!
August 20th, 2010 on 11:37 am
Dane, I tend to agree. I think the best fiction is both hilarious and heart-wrenching, well-written and well-plotted.