Pulped
by aleemartinez on Mar.24, 2010, under A. Lee Martinez
I miss pulp.
This doesn’t make much sense. I am too young to have experienced the age of pulp. I have a few Tarzan books from the age, but that’s about it.
This isn’t truly fair to the current world of publishing. It’s easy to look back at a bygone era and pine for the good ol’ days. But those days weren’t as good as you remember or imagine. The trick of memory and imagination is that it allows us to envision the past the way we want to, for good or ill. The pulp era I miss most probably never existed. It doesn’t stop me from missing them.
So what do I miss?
I miss when books were cheap, when they were less of a specialty product. I do have some experience with this as a long time comic book fan. If I may lapse into my whizzened old man voice for a moment:
In my day, comics cost seventy-five cents! And you didn’t need to go to some out of the way comic book store to get ‘em neither! All you had to do was walk down to the local convenience store and check out the spinnin’ rack. Sure, the comics were printed on cheap paper and full of advertisements, but at least ya could afford to buy ‘em and actually find ‘em without making a day trip outta it!
Resuming normal voice: Yes, it’s true. In many ways, it was a wonderful time to be a comic fan. Especially a young one. When I first collected comics, I did so because it was cheap. This is no longer true. The comic book market continues to shrink, and I believe it’s because the cost has put it out of the reach of the younger fans.
And isn’t it the same with the publishing industry? Aren’t novels getting awfully expensive? I love that I’m doing well enough and my publisher has enough faith in me to print my books in hardcover. Divine Misfortune is a low, low twenty bucks (subtle self-promotion at work), but that’s still not cheap. Certainly not pulp cheap.
In the (most probably imaginary) pulp era I envision in my dreams, books were cheap and plentiful. They had typos. Many of them were dreadful. But they were accessible. They were something anyone could buy without having to consider them “a hobby”. Reading was just something people did because it was easy and fun to do.
It’s easy to be critical. Especially when comparing the real world to some beautiful Utopia that only exists as a dream, a perfect world that never was. The publishing world has been very generous to me, and it’d be foolish of me to be ungrateful or excessively critical. My experience with publishers, editors, agents, and fans have all been uniformly wonderful, and in no way do I want to imply that dissatisfaction with my career is the the root of this yearning. I’ve done better than I have any right to expect.
But sometimes, just sometimes, when I close my eyes and allow myself the luxury, I miss pulp.
Related posts:
- Living in a fantasy world It’s not just the good ol’ days and the bygone eras that I miss. I miss the things that never actually happened and the places only dreamt of. I miss Middle Earth, Narnia, Fionavar, and Prydain. They never really existed anywhere except imagination - the authors’, mine, countless other readers’ -...
- The rules governing super bats You’re absolutely right, Lee. It’s not that I don’t like magic in my stories. I just don’t like ill-defined magic. I rebel against the use of magic as deus ex machina, but at the same time, I dislike book that provide a litany of rules and regulations regarding the uses...

March 24th, 2010 on 12:47 am
Okay okay, I will start buying your books in bulk and giving them to my less fortunate friends. :p
But yes, books are way more expensive then they used to be and I am sorry but since I routinely get mad at what I am reading (at least when it is a court decision I find infuriating), I like knowing I can throw the darn thing across the room which I could not do to a Kindle.
Plus my eyes are pretty bad already and that would just hasten my devastating eventual blindness.
March 24th, 2010 on 5:12 am
Well, I’m not exactly pro-Kindle either. As a tool for distribution, it’s exceptional. But the thing about paper books is that they are yours. You own them, and you can do what you want with them. In a completely Kindle-like future, used bookstores would be a relic. And I love used bookstores.
That is what was so great about pulp. It was cheap, permanent, and you didn’t even need electricity or a special device. You just needed the book.
I do like the Kindle and other e-readers. Anything that helps books reach a wider audience I’m all for. But I also worry about a world where electronic media becomes too prevalent. It’s not an easy issue, really, and I fully endorse anyone buying any of my books in whatever manner they find most convenient. But, myself, I prefer paper books.
But feel free to buy as many of my books as you like and give them to your friends. Heck, give ‘em two copies. One to read. And one to use as a doorstop or table de-wobbler.
March 25th, 2010 on 3:17 pm
From your voice to God (and Jim Lee)’s ears. How can they justify charging $4 for about 40 pages of comic? For an extra 2 bucks, I can buy a good-sized paperback that I will enjoy more (and longer).
While I really like a lot of the things about the digital revolution, the disappearance of newspapers and books is what I despise the most (besides not having a hover board yet…damn you Robert Zemeckis!). After sitting at a computer all day, there’s just something about holding a physical book or newspaper. I love the smell; the texture. Hell, I even like having to wash my hands after reading to clean off the smeared newsprint. That’s an experience I’ll never get with my e-reader (or paperweight as I affectionately call it).