Babel Clash

Batman IS NOT magic.  Batman IS fantasy, however.

Lee & I seem to be working with two very different definitions of magic.  In Lee’s definition, magic is synonymous with fantasy and the words can be used interchangeably.  This definition leads inexorably to the conclusion that Batman is magic because a) superheroes are magic and b) Batman is a superhero, therefore c) Batman is magic.  But, in my humble opinion, it is a sweeping generalisation to assume that all superheroes are magic.

In my definition, magic is a subset of fantasy.  To use the language of deductive reasoning, all magic is fantasy, but not all fantasy is magic.  I’m not disputing the fact that Batman is fantastic.  Batman is wicked fantastic.  Some of the stuff he can do is pretty darn unlikely.  But the fact remains that it is unlikely, not impossible.  Yes, it is very, very unlikely that one person could be the best at everything - detecting, disguising, super-sciencing, athleticism, you name it - but it is not impossible.  Yes, it would be bizarre for “real” people to run around dressed like bats, but it is not impossible.  Yes, it is unusual for real people to keep a Rogues’ Gallery, but Allan Pinkerton did and he was a real dude.  If it’s at all possible, no matter what the odds are against or how unlikely or remote, in my definition, it is fantasy not magic. 

Magic is the impossible.  It’s controlling wind (like Shannon Hale’s Goose Girl and Patrick Rothfuss’ Name of the Wind), it’s the ability to fly/levitate (like Brandon Sanderson’s Mistborn), it’s shooting bolts of fire (like Jim Butcher’s Dresden Files).  It’s the stuff that us mere mortals constrained by the laws of physics just couldn’t possibly do.

In conclusion, I would like to offer this Venn diagram as irrefutable proof that Batman, while he is fantasy, is most decidedly not magic.

Related posts:

• The rules governing super bats
  You’re absolutely right, Lee.  It’s not that I don’t like magic in my stories.  I just don’t like ill-defined magic.  I rebel against the use of magic as deus ex machina, but at the same time, I dislike book that provide a litany of rules and regulations regarding the uses...
• The Semantics of Fantasy Fans
  Ah, the debate continues.  Clearly, this is bigger than Batman.  This is about perception itself.  This is about fantasy versus reality, magic versus science. Really, this is all about semantics. So let’s walk away from the specific example of Batman for a moment and speak about fantasy and sci fi...
• The Batman Fallacy
  Batman IS magic. I suppose it’s a controversial observation, but indisputable. This should be fairly obvious, but I’ll go ahead and say it anyway.  Superheroes are magic.  There is nothing truly realistic about them.  From their flimsy disguises to their amazing abilities to their absurd adventures, there’s no way around...
• Abracadabra!
  How does magic work in my books? Short answer:  However I want it to. Long answer:  Depends on the book. I don’t believe in magic, but I don’t believe in vampires or raccoon gods and that doesn’t stop me from writing about them.  Nonetheless, magic is one of those fantasy...
• A. Lee Martinez: Why Radioactive Spider Bites Are Just Fine by Me
  When it comes to fantasy, I don’t mind if a writer ignores reality.  This shouldn’t be that odd.  Fantasy is, by definition, an escape from reality.  Or, if not an escape, at least a chance to see a world that might have been.  The important element is that, either...