Women, and Other Favorite Topics…
by joelshepherd on Mar.05, 2010, under Tom Lloyd and Joel Shepherd
I’ve come up with so many reasons why I like writing female characters, but I think what it all boils down to is that I like contrasts. Good SF&F creates a contrast between the real and the imagined worlds, and by that contrast, draws the subject into clearer relief. Likewise, putting a woman into a role more traditionally reserved for men creates a contrast between audience expectations, which are often subconscious, and the reality being presented. It makes everything fresher and more interesting, and as a writer it makes me consider things that I might otherwise have just taken for granted.
On Terry’s point, women in the role of trickster, I think there’s something to that… but on the other hand, many character types can play that role, I don’t think there’s anything inherently female about it. My key point is that different genders, in a medieval-style society in particular, will have to do things differently. Difference makes contrast, and contrast makes drama and thus entertainment. When everyone’s all the same, in any respect, I get bored, as a reader and a writer.
On Tom’s point about the role of frailty, I agree that frailty’s only fun when imposed upon a character who’s not accustomed to it. And here all the Buffy fans can recall the episode where, like, Buffy totally lost her powers, and like, it was so cool, ‘cause she couldn’t kick butt so easily, and she was all like, totally freaked out ‘cause she had to use her head and stuff instead of just beating things up? In ‘Petrodor’ I have a scene where Sasha is imprisoned, and writing how this hyperactive, hot tempered fighter handles doing nothing for a while was actually lots of fun.
I don’t really know if women’s relative scarcity in fantasy makes them more or less important to the plot — ‘A Trial of Blood and Steel’ is about evenly split, gender wise. And as the main character is female, there ends up being more ‘page time’ given to women than men. I can’t find fault in most fantasy for not having more female characters in the sense that I know my history and sociology and women in this world just don’t feature in big historical events like men do. But then, we’re talking about fantasy, not history. So if fantasy writers are excluding female characters from their stories, are they doing it out of concern for any sort of ‘accuracy’ (why should real world accuracy matter in a land of magic and dragons?) or merely to represent a medieval-style society that they feel personally most comfortable with? I say the latter. Which I find a little dull.
Related posts:
- Women are full of tricks? Being female, I have a visceral reaction to the idea that women are frail. Once I’m past that initial flare, I have to admit that most of the men I know could take me in a fair fight. That’s just the way it is. But the fact remains that there...
- Frailty and women – the uses thereof. I was going to post that I’m not a fan of frailty, or not to the degree Joel says he is, but thinking about my books that might not be so true. First and foremost I’m interested in power and its mechanics – what such a level of power can...
- Wanted: Weak Females Before we leave the topic of gender and sexual politics entirely, I thought I would bring up a link that was submitted by a Babel Clash reader a few months ago. The author makes some very good points about difference between strong - physically speaking - female characters and strong...
- Consistency, drama, women-vs-men, and more! I think the consistency thing is the most important. If your characters are going to transcend normal or ‘realistic’ physical boundaries, they should do so in a way that’s consistent with the rest of your world. Now occasionally you get even great writers violating this, like in one very ‘gritty...
- Sexual Politics, Farscape and Stuff. I think there’s some sexual politics at work here too. Ever since hard line feminism made it politically incorrect to portray female characters as too sexual, there’s been a reluctance from a lot of male writers to even go there. I ran into this a little bit from a small...

March 5th, 2010 on 9:07 am
I don’t know about the role of trickster, but I think women are often used in fantasy as a foil for more devious plot devices. And I think the stereotype is prevalent for men in fantasy as well - the heroic male, brawny and good for brute strength (in fact, it reminds me of playing the game Diablo II, where my husband played the barbarian ‘meat shield’ and I was the more devious sorcerous LOL). But I like the direction I find some fantasy authors going, i.e. Jacqueline Carey. I mean, who would have thought a successful heroine of the realm could really be a courtesan trained as a spy?
March 5th, 2010 on 12:44 pm
When I started writing fantasy, I was caught writing predominantly male protagonists and couldn’t explain why. Part of the reason was because that’s what I read growing up, which I think conditioned me to think that way. The traditional fantasy based on historical medieval society doesn’t help.
This discussion and panels at Boskone ‘46 were a great eye opener to the mechanisms that were guiding my lack of creativity. I’ve since started making conscious decisions to change conventions, and it’s enriched my fiction.
Thanks,
Dave