Gift Cards Borders Perks Borders Rewards BordersMedia Kids DVDs music Kids Home
Babel Clash
kateelliott

On Writing the Novel, Part Two

by kateelliott on Sep.24, 2009, under Kate Elliott and Ken Scholes

KEN:

What about you?  How do you tackle novels?  You’ve published 19 novels over the last 21 years.  How was it when you started?  How did it
evolve over time?  Do you find now that you have a consistent process that works or do you still change it up from time to time?

KATE:

For me, over time, the single most important principle (beyond persistence, persistence, persistence) has been to be adaptable.  I don’t write strictly to a previously scripted outline (I’m not saying others shouldn’t, if that’s a strategy that works for them, just that I don’t).  I write up notes, often reams of notes, some filed neatly in chronological order and others scrawled on scraps of paper which I excavate accidentally months or years later from some forgotten file folder.  For Crown of Stars early on I wrote up pages for each character listing things that I knew were going to happen to her or him, these lists running to multiple pages.  Or I set up a table and make a timeline, or a calendar, and fill in what I know, and then add as I go along.  I’ve done flow charts.  I’ve kept things in my head.

So, having said never ever, what have I just done?  I’ve just written a 45 page preliminary synopsis for a book.  It’s very detailed, with some scenes sketched in and dialogue written out.  But it’s the entire book’s plot.  I’ve never done that before.  Even The Sword of Heaven, a novel I made notes on for 10 years, resided mostly in my head before I wrote the actual first draft.  Now, of course, for all I know as I start writing the actual draft I’ll throw out everything.  Or half.  Or none.  I may find that having the synopsis works for this book.  Or not.  I’ll find out as I go.

That’s key for me:  Not to feel I’m locked into any form of the process.

Yes, I’ve learned ways to work that feel comfortable for me;  I’ve learned to watch for certain signals that impede or advance my progress.  If a scene gets sludgy, that can mean that I’m taking it in the wrong direction and need to rethink or re-vision it.  If a character pops up and says something I did not expect, I need to stop and look and decide whether this is a path I don’t need to go down, or whether my subconscious is telling me that this is a better way to go.  If I hit the slough of despond and decide this book out of all my books really sucks and I ought to consider abandoning it, I need to check where I am in the draft, and if I’m somewhere in the middle, it’s probably my cyclic despair prodding me:  I  always hit a “this sucks” phase in the middle of writing a book.  Always.  Except that one time I didn’t, and then I got worried that the book really was bad because I hadn’t gone through that phase.

When I look back at how I wrote my early novels, mostly I don’t remember much about the drafting process.  The main thing I do know is that I am much better at revising now than I was then.  As a newer writer, I preferred writing the first draft and found revising an onerous and difficult chore because I often didn’t really know how to fix things.  Now, I find writing first draft much more exhausting than I did then, but I love to revise because I get such pleasure from seeing the pieces smooth out and fit together to make the story I want to tell come alive.

Ken and I have talked about writing novels and writing series.  If you have any further comments or questions, post them here and we’ll answer.

Related posts:

  • On Writing the Series, Part 2
    KEN: How does your process differ from mine?  Is it more organic?  Do you work from outlines?  How much of the bones of the story do you have before you start adding the meat and muscle? KATE: First of all, your method of working is really cool.  And interesting.  And...
  • On Writing the Novel, Part One
    KATE: My bad.  My spouse travels a lot — and I mean a lot — for his work, and he arrived home Tuesday evening from the Gilbert Islands (google the battle of Tarawa, if you’re interested in where he was) and I totally forgot to post.  So, here we go....
  • On Writing the Series, Part 1
    KATE: Ken, I had a lot of trouble while writing my Crown of Stars series with the story growing 
longer and longer and turning, eventually, into a seven book trilogy, as I sometimes 
jokingly call it.  There are a lot of good things in that series that I’m really fond...
  • The “third volume produces twins” Syndrome
    KATE: Ken Scholes and I have arrived here at Babel Clash to blog your second half of September. 
Ken’s second novel, Canticle (the second of a five book cycle called The Psalms of Isaak) 
is due out in October, and my own Traitors’ Gate (the third and concluding volume of...

4 Comments for this entry

  • Adam

    I do have a question for Ken, actually, about his short fiction. What’s your process like for short fiction? Is it fast, like you get hit with an idea and run with it, or is it a slower, more methodical, research-heavy process? And what would you do if you’ve found you’ve hit a wall in one or tow, or all of your story ideas?

  • Michelle

    “Now, I find writing first draft much more exhausting than I did then, but I love to revise because I get such pleasure from seeing the pieces smooth out and fit together to make the story I want to tell come alive.”

    What is your revision process like? How do you know when the pieces “fit together”?

  • Ken Scholes

    Hi Adam. I’ve done both. Some of my short stories were years in the making — first drafts that I wasn’t sure how to fix until later, ideas that took a while to take shape. And I’ve written some where a first line or a title sprung to mind and then I just wrote like the wind and let the story evolve organically.

    For me, if I get stuck I usually pause and think it through or verbally process potential work-arounds with one of my writing pals. But sometimes, I’ve found myself stuck for a long stretch. “The Man With Great Despair Behind his Eyes” takes the record. The first draft sat, unrevised, for four years before I knew how to end it. But most of the time, I write a short story pretty quickly. It’s definitely gotten easier to know how to land them in the first draft over the years.

  • kateelliott

    Michelle,
    wow. I’m going to have to think about that, because I don’t usually analyze my revisions process, which has changed a lot over the years. If you keep an eye on my personal blog,
    http://kateelliott.livejournal.com/
    I will try to draft a longer and more comprehensive answer but it will take me a while.

    A lot of it is, as Ken said in his previous post, instinct — writing by ear — a sense of what fits, what isn’t working, and learning to trust when I know that it is working correctly. Also, understanding what doesn’t work and why —
    a sense of too much infodump, or when dialogue isn’t flowing right, or in a conversation I need to rearrange to make the emotional conflict, say, line up so the final lines of the exchange have their maximum impact. Things like that.

Leave a Reply

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!