Why Brent Weeks is so WRONG About Blogging
by joeabercrombie on Jul.21, 2009, under Brent Weeks and Joe Abercrombie
Brent, I have to violently disagree with you, and not just because we’ve framed this as a literary deathmatch, but also because you’re WRONG, so WRONG.
Your examples are poor. JRR would definitely have blogged had he had the technology available, but he was totally a console guy, played way too much Halo, and wouldn’t allow a PC in his home. Shakespeare? Have you read the sonnets? Obviously primitive blogs. Some of them he even printed out from his Sinclair ZX80, they have some of the original silvery whorls of printer tape in a glass case in the foyer of the Royal Shakespeare Company in Stratford. FACT.
I agree with you (grudgingly and with a massive sneer) that not every writer should blog. That writers shouldn’t feel it’s the default position, and that these days publishers are wont to encourage writers to blog/run a website and therefore do some of their own publicity and marketing (although why shouldn’t they?) The thing to avoid is that classic rather rubbish-looking template-based website with a post saying, “yeah! I’m blogging,” and one comment, then three posts the first day, one the next week, and one five months later saying, “yeah! I’m back! Sorry about the break!” Then nothing else ever since 2005. That does no one any good. You should decide your level of involvement and stick to it.
Whether the time a writer spends blogging actually makes sense commercially is a difficult question to answer, and will undoubtedly vary widely from writer to writer. It’s very unlikely you’ll be able to make anything significant from the “monetisation” of a blog (ads or amazon affiliation, that type of thing) even if you have a great deal of traffic. It’s also pretty unlikely you’ll sell huge numbers of extra copies directly because of your web presence – people will generally come to your website having read your books, rather than the other way around. But the benefits of blogging, or, indeed, any level of public involvement like signings, events, and conventions are a lot more subtle than simply how many books you sell directly through them. It’s the goodwill, the feeling of involvement on the part of both writer and readers, and the general raising of profile.
The argument that 1000 words of blog = 1000 words less of novel is a bit silly, frankly beneath even you, and belongs with those guys who say, “how dare George Martin take a crap, he should be spending that wasted crapping time on Dance with Dragons.” Writing a blog and writing a novel are very different activities. For me, blogging often almost serves as a break from the more pressured actual writing, or a way to get the juices flowing a bit when I feel like I can’t face the current book. Rarely will you sit down for two hours of self-flagellation to produce 18.3 words of blog. It allows you to get some involvement from readers and others, to discuss things, to get out of the lonely world of your own brain for a little while. Writing is a lonely business, and that element of social interaction (even via the faceless interweb) is valuable. You can get obsessed with your blogging, of course, with the instant gratification and the rush of getting response from readers who are otherwise endlessly a vague group, as if seen through a mist. But all things in moderation, and there’s no more harm in it than choosing to spend some of your day going for a run, or reading the newspaper. That is, none. Some writers who blog a bit have delayed novels. Some writers who blog an awful lot don’t.
But, you know, every author is different, every blog is different, and we all have to make up our own minds about what’s worthwhile commercially, artistically and, indeed, what we enjoy. Stargate Exec Producer Joe Mallozzi blogs every day about the show, about food, about books, about his responses to spam emails, a lot of it is very funny and he has a big following as a result. Hal Duncan blogs more rarely but at pretty incredible length and level of insight on issues of literature and semantics. I try to blog once or twice a week about what’s happening with the books, about films and video games, about the process of writing and publishing, about getting hit over the head with a banister and anything else of note. I’ve been doing it for a couple of years now, and I don’t reckon blogging has cost the public a huge amount of published work from me, but I have had a lot of fun doing it. Who knows, maybe some folks have had just a little bit reading it as well…?
So, yeah, Brent, maybe you just don’t get it. Although that news page you run on your website does look just a little teeny bit like a blog to me.
Related posts:
- Brent Weeks & Joe Abercrombie Thank you, once again, to Rob Sawyer for joining us on Babel Clash. I’m very excited to announce our next featured guests. In a Babel Clash first, we have two feature authors joining us. They are among fantasy’s rising superstars and rank among my own personal favorites. It’s with great...
- Why Novelists Shouldn’t Blog J.R.R. didn’t blog; George R. R. does. William Shakespeare didn’t; Joe Abercrombie does. Need I say more? No, but I will, because Al Gore created the internet FOR over-sharing. Blogging is a great time suck in the sky, but it’s worse for a novelist. Why? Because novelists don’t have a...
- Yes I am SO RIGHT, thanks for noticing “I know Joe has a persistent need for affirmation” Everyone knows this, though at least I don’t have an “OFFICIAL NETWORK” FORUM FOR PEOPLE TO TELL ME HOW GREAT I AM, with thread titles like, “High Praise to Brent Weeks,” or “thankyou Mr. Weeks,” or ”We love Brent Weeks so much we’re just...
- Why You Rule Brent & Joe, It has been a blast having you on Babel Clash. Thank you for sharing your battle of wits. With your last post or two, do you want to close with one final argument? Say, hypothetically, that a reader can only read one fantastic, brilliant book this summer....
- Are you game? Video game novels are trendy. Warcraft, Halo, Gear of War & Bioshock are games with novel tie-ins out or coming soon. So, Brent & Joe, to hypothetically assume the luxury of spare time, is there any franchise out there for which you’d want to write a novel? Or, even better…...

July 21st, 2009 on 8:15 am
has anyone read the book In a dark place by Ray Garton? Curiuos what facts are true in the movie A Haunting in Conn.
July 21st, 2009 on 12:39 pm
Brent is totally a blogger! Also a tweeter! Which must be worse.
July 21st, 2009 on 1:07 pm
I’m starting to suspect he may have exaggerated his anti-blog stance simply in order to get me going! Man, that makes me so mad!
July 21st, 2009 on 1:59 pm
I knew this would be funny as hell…I will give Joe a point for directing more people to Joe Mallozzi’s blog since I am an avid reader and he lead me to read Joe’s books in the first place. As for Brent…yes occasionally we get a twitter about beetle foreplay and the sex that follows but he really doesn’t blog—really…I check! I can’t wait for the next round…my two favorite fantasy authors…this is too fun…
BTW Brent–don’t take away my moderator privelages for this post…kay =)
July 21st, 2009 on 8:32 pm
Hal Duncan’s blogging is just scary…
But I am of the, not so humble, opinion that interaction with readers is often what keeps readers reading. If an author writes a book then vanishes in into the ether for a year before producing another they are less likely to have a continued readership (unless they pulled all that trilogy/series trickery) than an author that has been seen to be active and interacting with fans and maybe taken fifteen months. If nothing else, it keeps you semi-relevant, as well as providing a flexible tool for the author to more thoroughly brand himself.
July 21st, 2009 on 9:28 pm
Joblog, why would you think that me thinking that blogging is wrong would have any connection with whether or not I actually kinda-sorta blog myself? What are you expecting, consistency? “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” -Henry David Thoreau (I don’t actually know what that means, but it has a hobgoblin in it, and I’m a fantasy writer, so it works, right?)
Dyginc, Oh, sure, bring THAT one up. Thanks. You are so grounded.
Joe, exaggerating my stance? What, like this is some cheap marketing ploy to court controversy and get page views? How insulting!
Lisa, did you get lost? Oh, wait, you must have read Joe’s post. I got lost in that, too.
July 22nd, 2009 on 2:17 am
Dyginc,
Mallozzi is a class act. I really like the way he’s drawing the attention of Stargate fans to some up-to-the minute written sci-fi and fantasy. As well as employing Scalzi as a consultant.
Ty-real,
I dream of semi-relevance. One day, maybe…
Weeks,
Anything I have to say to you will be in the form of posts, not comments. Although if we comment, it makes it look as if we have more page views. So scratch that. Curse you WEEEEEEEEEEEEEKS!!!
July 22nd, 2009 on 3:41 am
SO. Since Joe Abercrombie’s post here has more pageviews it seems (It has to, with all the comments it has!), does that mean he wins this part of the argument?
July 22nd, 2009 on 6:04 am
I unfold my deck chair, I make popcorn. I add to the pageviews.
Also, I agree with Joe on this.
Because I’m scared of him.
July 22nd, 2009 on 7:16 am
fun posts, you’re both highly amusing. I must say though, I agree with Joe. while I find some new authors on the shelves, I’ve found more through their blogs/websites than elsewhere recently, including both of you.
time to lean back and wait for rd. 2.
July 22nd, 2009 on 11:47 am
Gotta go with Joe on this one, simply because I only like him more because he blogs-they’re frakkin ace!
But because of his love of sparring with Brent, I am now also willing to take a look a his stuff which I had heretofore not yet seen.
July 22nd, 2009 on 12:47 pm
I’m pretty sure JRRRRR would have blogged, and found it highly beneficial to boot! Why, the first draft of Vellum was actually one *million* pages long, full of all my linguistics gubbins, appendices on the nature of narrative, characters singing songs in the “Cant” and suchlike, until my psychiatrist diagnosed me as having Chronic Tolkien Syndrome and recommended blogging as an outlet for my language geekery.
True story, I swear.
July 22nd, 2009 on 1:19 pm
Hal,
Gotta like a guy who pluralizes appendix old-skool. I used to say things like “fora” instead of “forums,” but it just got too depressing.
I had a bout of CTS once, too. I realized I needed help after I considered publishing as Brent R. R. Weeks.
July 22nd, 2009 on 1:57 pm
The kids all say appendixez theez dayz on the forumz, apparently.
But Hal’s right. If JRR would’ve blogged maybe he’d have turned in a stripped-down novelette, like a fantasy F. Scott Fitzgerald.